Other blogs, mostly written by horny man-boys (kisses to IDLYITW), have been covering every single movement this chick Kelly Brook makes. I barely know that much about her – she’s a “model” but not like a fashion model or a Victoria’s Secret model, she’s a “model” for men’s magazine and such. She seems to be famous for having a pretty face and an enormous rack. Which, honestly, you could say about Christina Hendricks too, although I happen to think Hendricks is a wonderful actress and she’s also on one of the best shows on television. Kelly Brook doesn’t really have that much going on besides being a “model”. Also: just be a mean, vicious, bitchy, JELLY H8R, is it just me or is Kelly kind of cross-eyed?
She just seems famous with men. Women don’t seem to know her or care. Maybe she’s more famous and well-known in the UK, where she’s from? She doesn’t have awesome style, she’s only dated a few “celebrities” – she was in a long-term relationship with Jason Statham, she dated Billy Zane, and she was rumored to be boning Matthew Morrisson, although I really think that was a beard situation. No one really A-list or super-familiar to American audiences. So why is she getting so much coverage here? Boobs?
Oh, she’s in that dumb-looking Piranha 3-D movie. The header photo is of Kelly last night at the premiere, looking like Vanna White in the ‘80s. She’s also in Playboy in the September issue. Here are some pics:
Still not really getting it. Sure, she’s very pretty. But really, gentlemen? You’re working yourself into a lather for a brunette with a lovely rack? You know there are lots of brunettes with lovely racks, right?
Playboy photos courtesy of HuffPo. Header: Kelly on August 18, 2010. Credit: Bauer-Griffin.
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pLHLnpmirJOdxm%2BvzqZmamljaH12e9ahsJicn5SxtrDErJalp6aarKyxy6WwmJqipLysq9Kolqatk518